On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 12:34:06PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:03 PM Bruce Richardson
> <[1]bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:56:04AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:30 AM Bruce Richardson
> > <[1][2]bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The definition of CPU_AND differs from Linux to BSD, so we
> need to
> > use
> > RTE_CPU_AND instead.
> > Fixes: f6baccbc2b3b ("examples/l2fwd-cat: add sample
> application for
> > PQoS CAT and CDP")
> > Cc: [2][3]sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > This creates a dependency on backporting c3568ea37670 ("eal:
> restrict
> > control threads to startup CPU affinity") which introduced the
> > RTE_CPU_AND macro.
> > --
> > David Marchand
> >
> Shall I drop the stable reference from the v2, then?
>
> We can backport in 18.11, as I would expect c3568ea37670 to be
> backported.
> The question is more what we want to do with 17.11.
> We could backport only the macro bits from this patch if needed.
> --
Yes. I'll leave the stable cc and then each maintainer can decide
themselves on backport. I'll include note in the patch (below cutline) to
call out dependency explicitly.
/Bruce
