On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:45:56AM -0500, Kyle Larose wrote: > Earlier Stephen mentioned using the named pipe behaviour of tcpdump. > Is there an opportunity to take what you have mentioned here and marry > it to the named pipe output to get the perf you need?
I am wondering about the same thing. But I didn't want to limit the scope of solutions too much so I didn't specifically enumerate this possibility. Matthew.
