> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hajkowski > + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, GUEST_CLI, "Not expected command has > been received.\n"); Instead of : "Not expected command has been received ". How about, Received invalid response from host, expecting NACK/ACK? But let's hear from others. > + int result; > + ret = check_response_cmd(res->lcore_id, &result); > + if (ret < 0) { > + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, GUEST_CLI, "No confirmation for sent msg > received\n"); > + } else { > + cmdline_printf(cl, "Ack for sent msg received with result: > %s.\n", > + result == 1 ? "SUCCESS" : "ERROR"); > + } > } In else statement how about just checking for result ACK/NACK and have log saying received ACK /received NACK for msg Thanks, Reshma
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] power: send confirmation cmd to... Hajkowski
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] power: send confirmati... Burakov, Anatoly
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] power: fix invalid socket indic... Hajkowski
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] power: fix invalid soc... Maxime Coquelin
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] power: fix invalid soc... Burakov, Anatoly
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] bidirect guest channel Thomas Monjalon
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] bidirect guest channel Hajkowski
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] power: fix invalid socket ... Hajkowski
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] power: extend guest channe... Hajkowski
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] power: process incoming co... Hajkowski
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] power: process inc... Pattan, Reshma
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] power: send confirmation c... Hajkowski