>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 2:09 PM
>To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.w...@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh 
><sameh.gobr...@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
><bruce.richard...@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo 
><pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John
><john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovace...@intel.com>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thak...@arm.com>
>Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket
>
>This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for
>extendable bucket feature.
>
>Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
>Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thak...@arm.com>
>Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
>Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin...@arm.com>
>Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
>@@ -1072,7 +1082,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, 
>const void *key,
>       bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1;
>       /* Use the first location of the new bucket */
>       (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig;
>-      (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx;
>+      /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is
>+       * not possible to store it atomically.
>+       * Hence the new key element's memory stores
>+       * (key as well as data) should be complete
>+       * before it is referenced.
>+       */
[Wang, Yipeng] Minor issue: does this comment need to be fixed too? If so you 
could include my ack for next version.

Acked-by: Yipeng Wang  <yipeng1.w...@intel.com>


Thanks
Yipeng!

Reply via email to