> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hajkowski > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 10:55 AM > + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, POWER, "No confirmation for sent msg > received\n"); > + } As Anatoly mentioned, we should not use POWER log here, instead #define RTE_LOGTYPE_GUEST_CHANNEL RTE_LOGTYPE_USER1 is defined for GUEST_CHANNEL logs, you should use that for the logs in this file. Thanks, Reshma
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] bidirect guest channel Hajkowski
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] power: process incoming... Hajkowski
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] power: process ... Burakov, Anatoly
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] power: process ... Pattan, Reshma
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] power: extend guest cha... Hajkowski
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] power: extend g... Maxime Coquelin
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] power: exte... Ananyev, Konstantin
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] power: extend g... Burakov, Anatoly
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] power: send confirmatio... Hajkowski
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] power: send con... Burakov, Anatoly
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] power: fix invalid sock... Hajkowski
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] power: fix inva... Maxime Coquelin
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] power: fix inva... Burakov, Anatoly
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] bidirect guest chan... Thomas Monjalon