On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:40:26 +0800 Tiwei Bie <tiwei....@intel.com> wrote:
> > I agree the vq_ prefix is not needed and I think the code is more > > readable in general seeing the packed/split name when using the struct. > > > > Please also consider that cosmetic changes in multiple places likely > > mean backports will not apply cleanly to the stable branches anymore, so > > it does have a cost. > > Yeah, agree. prefixing structure elements is an old school BSD thing back from when compilers were not smart about namespaces for identifiers. Agree that it is no longer needed.