On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:26 PM Zhaohui (zhaohui, Polestar) <
zhaoh...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi：
> When the number of slave slave devices exceeds 8, it will cause
> the array subscript to cross the boundary.
> According to the suggestions, Modified array subscript to
> RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS, and Changed uint8_t to uint16_t. Something like this:
>
> From 51a081ea88cca1599d458d8d1c7d9605a6eb3352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: zhaohui8 <zhaoh...@huawei.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:17:27 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] net/bonding: fix Segfault when eal thread executing nic‘s
> lsc event for mode 4
>
> Change-Id: I6d800a3adf5ca51f295b607de879bcb0ccc20004
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> index dd847c6..4d99239 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
> SM_FLAG_CLR(port, NTT);
> }
> -static uint8_t
> +static uint16_t
> max_index(uint64_t *a, int n)
> {
> if (n <= 0)
> @@ -664,15 +664,15 @@
> * @param port_pos Port to assign.
> */
> static void
> -selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint8_t slave_id)
> +selection_logic(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint16_t slave_id)
> {
> struct port *agg, *port;
> uint16_t slaves_count, new_agg_id, i, j = 0;
> uint16_t *slaves;
> - uint64_t agg_bandwidth[8] = {0};
> - uint64_t agg_count[8] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_bandwidth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
> + uint64_t agg_count[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
> uint16_t default_slave = 0;
> - uint8_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
> + uint16_t mode_count_id, mode_band_id;
> struct rte_eth_link link_info;
> slaves = internals->active_slaves;
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
> struct ether_addr slave_addr;
> struct rte_mbuf *lacp_pkt = NULL;
> - uint8_t i, slave_id;
> + uint16_t i, slave_id;
>
> /* Update link status on each port */
> --
> 1.9.5.msysgit.0
>
>
Oh, I had missed this [8] array, good catch.
For the slave id on 16bits, I sent this earlier:
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/51387/
And I have other fixes for 802.3ad that I will send once properly tested.
--
David Marchand
