I see issue with reorder test app failing on x86 environment due to changes made between release 2.0.0 and 2.1.0:
App reorder_test (app/test/test_reorder.c) ============ Function failing: test_reorder_insert There had been some changes with respect to addition of parameter is_initialized to the structure rte_reorder_buffer. In parallel the changes were made to initialize some of the parameters in function rte_reorder_insert rte_reorder_insert(struct rte_reorder_buffer *b, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf) { uint32_t offset, position; struct cir_buffer *order_buf = &b->order_buf; * if (!b->is_initialized) {* * b->min_seqn = mbuf->seqn;* *b->is_initialized = 1;* * }* => I don't see any reason to set b->min_seqn to mbuf->seqn and if that has to be done, the conditional checks should have been modified in function test_reorder_insert soon after a call to rte_reorder_insert. Additionally, the next seqn number being populated should have been changed in function test_reorder_insert: ret = rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[0]); * if (!((ret == -1) && (rte_errno == ERANGE))) {* * printf("%s:%d: No error inserting late packet with seqn:"* * " 3 * size\n", __func__, __LINE__);* * ret = -1;* * goto exit;* * }* for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++) bufs[i]->seqn = i; On the other hand, changing the code in function rte_reorder_insert: rte_reorder_insert(struct rte_reorder_buffer *b, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf) { uint32_t offset, position; struct cir_buffer *order_buf = &b->order_buf; if (!b->is_initialized) { * b->min_seqn = 0; //Removed initialization from mbuf->seqn* b->is_initialized = 1; } fixes the issues and the test case passes. Regards, Mukesh