The string compare to the length of driver name might give false
positives when there are drivers with similar names (one being the
subset of another).
Following is such a naming which could result in false positive.
1. crypto_driver
2. crypto_driver1
When strncmp with len = strlen("crypto_driver") is done, it could give
a false positive when compared against "crypto_driver1". For such cases,
'strlen + 1' is done, so that the NULL termination also would be
considered for the comparison.
Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto
devices")
Signed-off-by: Ankur Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>
---
v2:
* Using strlen + 1, instead of RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN for the comparison.
* Strcmp would not cause this issue. Touching only the places which
would result in the issue.
lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
index 7009735..871d7dd 100644
--- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_devices_get(const char *driver_name, uint8_t
*devices,
cmp = strncmp(devs[i].device->driver->name,
driver_name,
- strlen(driver_name));
+ strlen(driver_name) + 1);
if (cmp == 0)
devices[count++] = devs[i].data->dev_id;
@@ -1691,7 +1691,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_driver_id_get(const char *name)
TAILQ_FOREACH(driver, &cryptodev_driver_list, next) {
driver_name = driver->driver->name;
- if (strncmp(driver_name, name, strlen(driver_name)) == 0)
+ if (strncmp(driver_name, name, strlen(driver_name) + 1) == 0)
return driver->id;
}
return -1;
--
2.7.4