Hi Arek,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
> Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 11:13 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: shally.ve...@caviumnetworks.com; sunila.s...@caviumnetworks.com;
> ashish.gu...@caviumnetworks.com; umesh.kar...@caviumnetworks.com; Trahe, Fiona
> <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; akhil.go...@nxp.com; Kusztal, ArkadiuszX 
> <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] cryptodev: rework mod exp and mod inv comments
> 
> This patch changes modular exponentiation and modular multiplicative
> inverse API comments to make it more precise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>

> +      * In case this number is equal to zero driver set crypto op
> +      * status field to RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_ERROR
[Fiona] grammar nit - ....the driver should set the crypto op.....

> - * Structure describing modulus inverse xform params
> + * Structure describing modular multiplicative inverse transform xform params
[Fiona] grammar nit - no need for transform and xform - one will do. 

> +      * In case this number is equal to zero driver set crypto op
> +      * status field to RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_ERROR
[Fiona] grammar nit - same comment as above 

> +      *
> +      * This number need to be relatively prime to base
> +      * in corresponding Modular Multiplicative Inverse
> +      * rte_crypto_mod_op_param
>        */
[Fiona] grammar nit - "The number needs..." or "This number should be" 

>  struct rte_crypto_mod_op_param {
>       rte_crypto_param base;
>       /**<
> -      * Pointer to base of modular exponentiation/inversion data in
> -      * Octet-string network byte order format.
> +      * Pointer to base of modular exponentiation/multiplicative
> +      * inverse data in Octet-string network byte order format.
[Fiona] grammar nit - octet-string - no need for capitalisation
> +      *
> +      * In case Multiplicative Inverse is used this number need
> +      * to be relatively prime to modulus in corresponding Modular
> +      * Multiplicative Inverse rte_crypto_modinv_xform
[Fiona] grammar nit - same comment as above


Reply via email to