> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 9:16 PM
> To: Jay Rolette <role...@infinite.io>
> Cc: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas
> Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Jerin Jacob
> <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>;
> Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q
> <qian.q...@intel.com>; Yongseok Koh <ys...@mellanox.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Shahaf
> Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; O'Hare, Cathal
> <cathal.oh...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Kevin
> Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Timothy Redaelli <tredae...@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
>
> Jay Rolette <role...@infinite.io> writes:
>
> >> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> >> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> >> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
> >
> > We do @ infinite io.
>
> +1. Red Hat also uses the LTS releases.
Hi,
I should have been clearer on this. I meant the non-LTS "stable" release (the
one we maintain for one release cycle). Historically it was meant for CVEs and
hot-fixes on the head release. The question related to that stable release and
whether people use it.
As suggested on the maintainers call the other day I'll probably put together a
survey to find out.
The utility of the LTS releases isn't in question. :-)
John
