> Changed size of test buffer to 100 to allow qat to run compress unit-test,
> qat_comp_process_response():
> QAT intermediate buffer may be too small for output, try configuring a larger
> size
>
> Fixes: c1bbb613ce96 ("test/compress: add out of space test")
> Cc: marko.kovace...@intel.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovace...@intel.com>
> ---
> test/test/test_compressdev.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/test/test_compressdev.c b/test/test/test_compressdev.c
> index e8476ed..4db65c4 100644
> --- a/test/test/test_compressdev.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_compressdev.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> #define GZIP_HEADER_SIZE 10
> #define GZIP_TRAILER_SIZE 8
>
> -#define OUT_OF_SPACE_BUF 1
> +#define OUT_OF_SPACE_BUF 100
>
> const char *
> huffman_type_strings[] = {
> @@ -597,13 +597,15 @@ prepare_sgl_bufs(const char *test_buf, struct
> rte_mbuf *head_buf,
> uint32_t total_data_size,
> struct rte_mempool *small_mbuf_pool,
> struct rte_mempool *large_mbuf_pool,
> - uint8_t limit_segs_in_sgl)
> + uint8_t limit_segs_in_sgl,
> + const struct test_data_params *test_params)
> {
> uint32_t remaining_data = total_data_size;
> uint16_t num_remaining_segs = DIV_CEIL(remaining_data,
> SMALL_SEG_SIZE);
> struct rte_mempool *pool;
> struct rte_mbuf *next_seg;
> uint32_t data_size;
> + unsigned int out_of_space = test_params->out_of_space;
> char *buf_ptr;
> const char *data_ptr = test_buf;
> uint16_t i;
> @@ -639,6 +641,10 @@ prepare_sgl_bufs(const char *test_buf, struct
> rte_mbuf *head_buf,
> * Allocate the rest of the segments,
> * copy the rest of the data and chain the segments.
> */
> + if (out_of_space)
> + num_remaining_segs = 1;
> +
> +
> for (i = 0; i < num_remaining_segs; i++) {
>
> if (i == (num_remaining_segs - 1)) {
> @@ -647,9 +653,11 @@ prepare_sgl_bufs(const char *test_buf, struct
> rte_mbuf *head_buf,
> pool = large_mbuf_pool;
> else
> pool = small_mbuf_pool;
> - data_size = remaining_data;
> + out_of_space ? data_size = out_of_space :
> + (data_size = remaining_data);
> } else {
> - data_size = SMALL_SEG_SIZE;
> +
> + (data_size = SMALL_SEG_SIZE);
> pool = small_mbuf_pool;
> }
>
> @@ -759,7 +767,8 @@ test_deflate_comp_decomp(const struct
> interim_data_params *int_data,
> data_size,
> ts_params->small_mbuf_pool,
> ts_params->large_mbuf_pool,
> - MAX_SEGS) < 0)
> + MAX_SEGS,
> + test_data) < 0)
> goto exit;
> }
> } else {
> @@ -791,7 +800,8 @@ test_deflate_comp_decomp(const struct
> interim_data_params *int_data,
> data_size,
> ts_params->small_mbuf_pool,
> ts_params->large_mbuf_pool,
> - MAX_SEGS) < 0)
> + MAX_SEGS,
> + test_data) < 0)
> goto exit;
> }
>
> @@ -1019,7 +1029,8 @@ test_deflate_comp_decomp(const struct
> interim_data_params *int_data,
> data_size,
> ts_params->small_mbuf_pool,
> ts_params->large_mbuf_pool,
> - MAX_SEGS) < 0)
> + MAX_SEGS,
> + test_data) < 0)
> goto exit;
> }
>
> --
Self Nack
After some investigation from Pablo and after a conversation was had we have
come to the conclusion that there might be an error somewhere else and just a
check that needs to be added and that the unit test just exposed it and not
that the unit test itself was wrong I can't confirm that as of yet until
further investigation is done
