Hi Konstantin,
<snip>
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2] test/ipsec: fix test suite setup function
> > >
> > > Check for valid crypto_null device before continuing.
> > > Use valid_dev instead of valid_devs[].
> > > Call create_crypto_session for one driver only.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 05fe65eb66b2 ("test/ipsec: introduce functional test")
> > > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > test/test/test_ipsec.c | 91
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/test/test/test_ipsec.c b/test/test/test_ipsec.c index
> > > ff1a1c4..a5c1c4b 100644
> > > --- a/test/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > +++ b/test/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct ipsec_testsuite_params {
> > > struct rte_cryptodev_config conf;
> > > struct rte_cryptodev_qp_conf qp_conf;
> > >
> > > - uint8_t valid_devs[RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS];
> > > + uint8_t valid_dev;
> > > uint8_t valid_dev_count;
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -218,8 +218,9 @@ testsuite_setup(void) {
> > > struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> > > struct rte_cryptodev_info info;
> > > - uint32_t nb_devs, dev_id;
> > > + uint32_t i, nb_devs, dev_id;
> > > size_t sess_sz;
> > > + int driver_id;
> > >
> > > memset(ts_params, 0, sizeof(*ts_params));
> > >
> > > @@ -251,10 +252,24 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
> > > return TEST_FAILED;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - ts_params->valid_devs[ts_params->valid_dev_count++] = 0;
> > > + driver_id = rte_cryptodev_driver_id_get(
> > > + RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_NULL_PMD));
> >
> >
> > I still think that guessing device capabilities by driver name is not
> > a right approach.
> > Please use check_device_capabilites() here.
>
> Ok, this will require some refactoring of the tests.
I will refactor test_ipsec.c
> > > +
> > > + /* Find first valid crypto device */
> > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_devs; i++) {
> > > + rte_cryptodev_info_get(i, &info);
> > > + if (info.driver_id == driver_id) {
> > > + ts_params->valid_dev = i;
> > > + ts_params->valid_dev_count++;
> >
> > As you use only one device now, I don't think you need valid_dev_count
> > any more.
>
> I will check if it is still needed.
Still need to know that a valid device has been found.
I will rename valid_dev_count to valid_dev_found.
>
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (ts_params->valid_dev_count < 1)
> > > + return TEST_FAILED;
> > >
>
> <snip>
I will send a v3 patch.
Regards,
Bernard.
