On 11/01/19 9:42 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/11/2019 3:51 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 1/11/2019 12:24 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote: >>> (N: Original series was by Hemant - due to RC window timeline and >>> his unavailability, respining on his behalf) >>> >>> This patch set covers following: >>> >>> 1. Fixes in the existing NXP DPAA2 bus and net pmd >>> 2. New object (DPDMUX) support in NIC driver for better classification >>> 3. Improvements to support secondary process >>> 4. Upgrade the low level QBMAN HW lib >>> >>> History: >>> v1->v2: >>> - Fix warning on Patch 20/20 - moved printfs to logging macro >>> and PRIx changes >>> - reset author of 07/20 as the signoff and author didn't match >>> - Validate over master (a958a5c07f4b5e) >>> - Reword patch headline/commit based on check-git-log script >>> >>> v2->v3: >>> - Remove last (20/20) patch which was introducing a new API >>> within FSLMC layer >>> >>> Akhil Goyal (1): >>> net/dpaa2: enable optional timestamp in mbuf >>> >>> Hemant Agrawal (7): >>> bus/fslmc: fix to use correct physical core for logical core >>> net/dpaa2: fix bad check for not-null >>> bus/fslmc: fix to convert error msg to warning >>> bus/fslmc: upgrade to latest qbman library >>> bus/fslmc: add dynamic config for memback portal mode >>> bus/fslmc: rename portal pi index to consumer index >>> bus/fslmc: make portal func static >>> >>> Nipun Gupta (4): >>> net/dpaa2: add dpdmux mc flib >>> bus/fslmc: add support for scanning DPDMUX object >>> net/dpaa2: add dpdmux initialization and configuration >>> net/dpaa2: add API to support custom hash key >>> >>> Sachin Saxena (1): >>> bus/fslmc: fix to reset portal memory before use >>> >>> Shreyansh Jain (5): >>> bus/fslmc: fix parse method for bus devices >>> net/dpaa2: fix device init for secondary process >>> mempool/dpaa2: support saving context of buffer pool >>> net/dpaa2: change reference to private device >>> bus/fslmc: add support for secondary processes >>> >>> Youri Querry (1): >>> bus/fslmc: fix the ring mode to use correct cache settings >> >> Hi Shreyansh, >> >> Can I add your explicit ack to the series? > > Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. > > (For ones from non-maintainers, Shreyansh's ack added) >
Hi Ferruh, Apologies - I didn't notice this email earlier. I am OK with ACK you have applied and I have also replied back with a formal ACK to V3. - Shreyansh
