> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 11:00 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>
> Cc: Mattias Rönnblom <hof...@lysator.liu.se>; Honnappa Nagarahalli 
> <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org; nd
> <n...@arm.com>; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <gavin...@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] rwlock: introduce 'try' semantics for RD 
> and WR locking
> 
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:56:09AM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:hof...@lysator.liu.se]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 10:28 AM
> > > To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Ananyev, 
> > > Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <gavin...@arm.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] rwlock: introduce 'try' semantics for 
> > > RD and WR locking
> > >
> > > On 2018-12-19 07:37, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > >> b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > >> index 3fe78260d..8b1593dd8 100644
> > > >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > >> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> > > >>        rte_mp_request_async;
> > > >>        rte_mp_sendmsg;
> > > >>        rte_option_register;
> > > >> +      rte_rwlock_read_trylock;
> > > >> +      rte_rwlock_write_trylock;
> > > > I do not see the other RW lock APIs in this file.
> > > >
> > >
> > > They, just like those added, are static inline functions, will not
> > > result in any symbols in any shared objects and thus shouldn't be in any
> > > version.map file.
> >
> > So, are you guys trying to say that there is no need to put these 'trylock'
> > functions into 'experimental' section?
> > Konstantin
> >
> Anything static inline doesn't have a mapfile entry, so there is no issue
> there.

Ok, if these map entries are not needed, I'll remove them in v2. 

> However, the APIs themselves, since they are new should probably
> have the __rte_experimental attribute marked on them in the code.

They do have __rte_experimental attribute in the .h file.
Konstantin

Reply via email to