On 12/18/2018 1:42 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 4/29/2015 12:46 AM, rkerur at gmail.com (Ravi Kerur) wrote: >> Changes in v8 >> Fix ABI warnings by reordering compilation of >> eal_common_sysfs.c >> eal_common_mem_cfg.c >> eal_common_proc_type.c >> eal_common_app_usage.c >> >> Changes in v7 >> Fix compilation errors in clang. >> >> Changes in v6 >> Split eal_common_system.c and eal_common_runtime.c into >> eal_common_sysfs.c >> eal_common_mem_cfg.c >> eal_common_proc_type.c >> eal_common_app_usage.c >> based on functionality. >> >> Changes in v5 >> Rebase to latest code. >> >> Changes in v4 >> Remove eal_externs.h file, instead use _get_ and _set_ APIS >> to access those variables. >> Split eal_common.c into eal_common_system.c and >> and eal_common_runtime.c >> rte_eal prefix functions are moved to _runtime_ and >> eal prefix functions are moved to _system_ files respectively. >> >> Changes in v3 >> Changed subject to be more explicit on file name inclusion. >> >> Changes in v2 >> In function rte_eal_config_create remove #ifdef _BSDAPP_ >> and initialize mem_cfg_addr unconditionally. >> >> Changes in v1 >> Move common functions in eal.c to librte_eal/common/eal_common.c. >> >> Following functions are moved to eal_common.c file. >> >> struct rte_config *rte_eal_get_configuration(void); >> int eal_parse_sysfs_value(const char *filename, unsigned long *val); >> static void rte_eal_config_create(void); >> enum rte_proc_type_t eal_proc_type_detect(void); >> void rte_eal_config_init(void); >> rte_usage_hook_t rte_set_application_usage_hook(rte_usage_hook_t >> usage_func); >> inline size_t eal_get_hugepage_mem_size(void); >> void eal_check_mem_on_local_socket(void); >> int sync_func(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg); >> inline void rte_eal_mcfg_complete(void); >> int rte_eal_has_hugepages(void); >> enum rte_lcore_role_t rte_eal_lcore_role(unsigned lcore_id); >> enum rte_proc_type_t rte_eal_process_type(void); >> >> Makefile changes to reflect new files added. >> Fix checkpatch warnings and errors. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kerur <rkerur at gmail.com> > > Hi Ravi, > > This patch is sitting on patchwork since 2015, I am updating it as rejected, > if > it is still relevant please let us know. > > Sorry for any inconvenience caused. >
for record, it is: https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/4487/
