Thanks, PSB.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ori Kam
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 11:23 PM
> To: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>; wenzhuo...@intel.com;
> jingjing...@intel.com; bernard.iremon...@intel.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Shahaf Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>; Dekel Peled
> <dek...@mellanox.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix MPLSoGRE encapsulation
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Dekel Peled
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 3:52 PM
> > To: wenzhuo...@intel.com; jingjing...@intel.com;
> > bernard.iremon...@intel.com
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler
> > <shah...@mellanox.com>; Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix MPLSoGRE encapsulation
> >
> > In function cmd_set_mplsogre_encap_parsed(), MPLS label value was set
> > in mplsogre_encap_conf struct without the required offset.
> > As a result the value was copied incorrectly into rte_flow_item_mpls
> > struct.
> >
> > This patch sets MPLS label value in appropriate location at
> > mplsogre_encap_conf struct, so it is correctly copied to
> > rte_flow_item_mpls struct.
> >
> > Fixes: 3e77031be855 ("app/testpmd: add MPLSoGRE encapsulation")
> > Cc: or...@mellanox.com
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 7 +++----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> > 8630be6..3ddc3e0 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > @@ -15567,10 +15567,9 @@ static void
> > cmd_set_mplsogre_encap_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> > struct cmd_set_mplsogre_encap_result *res = parsed_result;
> > union {
> > uint32_t mplsogre_label;
> > - uint8_t label[3];
> > + uint8_t label[4];
> > } id = {
> > - .mplsogre_label =
> > - rte_cpu_to_be_32(res->label) &
> RTE_BE32(0x00ffffff),
> > + .mplsogre_label = rte_cpu_to_be_32(res->label<<12),
>
> Why did you remove the mask?
The mask of all valid bits set to 1 is redundant.
After <<12 the 20 valid bits are not changed, and the other 12 bits are set to
0.
>
> > };
> >
> > if (strcmp(res->mplsogre, "mplsogre_encap") == 0) @@ -15583,7
> > +15582,7 @@ static void cmd_set_mplsogre_encap_parsed(void
> > *parsed_result,
> > mplsogre_encap_conf.select_ipv4 = 0;
> > else
> > return;
> > - rte_memcpy(mplsogre_encap_conf.label, &id.label[1], 3);
> > + rte_memcpy(mplsogre_encap_conf.label, &id.label, 3);
> > if (mplsogre_encap_conf.select_ipv4) {
> > IPV4_ADDR_TO_UINT(res->ip_src,
> > mplsogre_encap_conf.ipv4_src);
> > IPV4_ADDR_TO_UINT(res->ip_dst,
> > mplsogre_encap_conf.ipv4_dst);
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
>
> Best,
> Ori
