On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 07:01:23PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 28.11.2018 12:47, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > Instead of writing back descriptors chains in order, let's
> > write the first chain flags last in order to improve batching.
> 
> I'm not sure if this fully compliant with virtio spec.
> It says that 'each side (driver and device) are only required to poll
> (or test) a single location in memory', but it does not forbid to
> test other descriptors. So, if the driver will try to check not only
> 'the next device descriptor after the one they processed previously,
> in circular order' but a few descriptors ahead, it could read an
> inconsistent memory because there are no more write barriers between
> updates for flags and id/len for them.
> 
> What do you think ?

Write barriers for SMP effects are quite cheap on most architectures.
So adding them before each flag write is probably not a big deal.


> > 
> > With Kernel's pktgen benchmark, ~3% performance gain is measured.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> > Tested-by: Jens Freimann <jfreim...@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jens Freimann <jfreim...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > index 5e1a1a727..f54642c2d 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -135,19 +135,10 @@ flush_shadow_used_ring_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
> >                     struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> >  {
> >     int i;
> > -   uint16_t used_idx = vq->last_used_idx;
> > +   uint16_t head_flags, head_idx = vq->last_used_idx;
> >  
> > -   /* Split loop in two to save memory barriers */
> > -   for (i = 0; i < vq->shadow_used_idx; i++) {
> > -           vq->desc_packed[used_idx].id = vq->shadow_used_packed[i].id;
> > -           vq->desc_packed[used_idx].len = vq->shadow_used_packed[i].len;
> > -
> > -           used_idx += vq->shadow_used_packed[i].count;
> > -           if (used_idx >= vq->size)
> > -                   used_idx -= vq->size;
> > -   }
> > -
> > -   rte_smp_wmb();
> > +   if (unlikely(vq->shadow_used_idx == 0))
> > +           return;
> >  
> >     for (i = 0; i < vq->shadow_used_idx; i++) {
> >             uint16_t flags;
> > @@ -165,12 +156,22 @@ flush_shadow_used_ring_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
> >                     flags &= ~VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL;
> >             }
> >  
> > -           vq->desc_packed[vq->last_used_idx].flags = flags;
> > +           vq->desc_packed[vq->last_used_idx].id =
> > +                   vq->shadow_used_packed[i].id;
> > +           vq->desc_packed[vq->last_used_idx].len =
> > +                   vq->shadow_used_packed[i].len;
> > +
> > +           if (i > 0) {

Specifically here?

> > +                   vq->desc_packed[vq->last_used_idx].flags = flags;
> >  
> > -           vhost_log_cache_used_vring(dev, vq,
> > +                   vhost_log_cache_used_vring(dev, vq,
> >                                     vq->last_used_idx *
> >                                     sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc),
> >                                     sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc));
> > +           } else {
> > +                   head_idx = vq->last_used_idx;
> > +                   head_flags = flags;
> > +           }
> >  
> >             vq->last_used_idx += vq->shadow_used_packed[i].count;
> >             if (vq->last_used_idx >= vq->size) {
> > @@ -180,7 +181,15 @@ flush_shadow_used_ring_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
> >     }
> >  
> >     rte_smp_wmb();
> > +
> > +   vq->desc_packed[head_idx].flags = head_flags;
> >     vq->shadow_used_idx = 0;
> > +
> > +   vhost_log_cache_used_vring(dev, vq,
> > +                           head_idx *
> > +                           sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc),
> > +                           sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc));
> > +
> >     vhost_log_cache_sync(dev, vq);
> >  }
> >  
> > 

Reply via email to