On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:46:04PM +0800, Xiao Wang wrote:
[...]
> @@ -767,6 +771,7 @@ ifcvf_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv 
> __rte_unused,
>       struct ifcvf_internal *internal = NULL;
>       struct internal_list *list = NULL;
>       int vdpa_mode = 0;
> +     int sw_fallback_lm = 0;
>       struct rte_kvargs *kvlist = NULL;
>       int ret = 0;
>  
> @@ -826,6 +831,16 @@ ifcvf_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv 
> __rte_unused,
>       internal->dev_addr.type = PCI_ADDR;
>       list->internal = internal;
>  
> +     if (rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, IFCVF_SW_FALLBACK_LM)) {
> +             ret = rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, IFCVF_SW_FALLBACK_LM,
> +                             &open_int, &sw_fallback_lm);
> +             if (ret < 0)
> +                     goto error;
> +             internal->sw_lm = sw_fallback_lm ? true : false;
> +     } else {
> +             internal->sw_lm = false;
> +     }

Something like this would be better:

        if (rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, IFCVF_SW_FALLBACK_LM)) {
                ret = rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, IFCVF_SW_FALLBACK_LM,
                                &open_int, &sw_fallback_lm);
                if (ret < 0)
                        goto error;
        }

        internal->sw_lm = sw_fallback_lm;


>       internal->did = rte_vdpa_register_device(&internal->dev_addr,
>                               &ifcvf_ops);
>       if (internal->did < 0) {
> -- 
> 2.15.1
> 

Reply via email to