Hi all,

Could anyone please have a review and re-test the change?

Thanks a lot!

Br,
Tone

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of tone.zhang
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 10:37 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <gavin...@arm.com>; Honnappa
> Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Steve Capper
> <steve.cap...@arm.com>; anatoly.bura...@intel.com; nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] pci_vfio: Support 64KB kernel page_size with
> vfio-pci driver
> 
> With a larger PAGE_SIZE it is possible for the MSI table to very close to the 
> end
> of the BAR s.t. when we align the start and end of the MSI table to the
> PAGE_SIZE, the end offset of the MSI table is out of the PCI BAR boundary.
> 
> This patch addresses the issue by comparing both the start and the end offset 
> of
> the MSI table with the BAR size, and skip the mapping if it is out of Bar 
> scope.
> 
> The patch fixes the debug log as below:
> EAL: Skipping BAR0
> 
> Signed-off-by: tone.zhang <tone.zh...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.cap...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c 
> b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> index ffd26f1..0e7bfd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> @@ -457,9 +457,11 @@ pci_vfio_mmap_bar(int vfio_dev_fd, struct
> mapped_pci_resource *vfio_res,
>       struct pci_msix_table *msix_table = &vfio_res->msix_table;
>       struct pci_map *bar = &vfio_res->maps[bar_index];
> 
> -     if (bar->size == 0)
> +     if (bar->size == 0) {
>               /* Skip this BAR */
> +             RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Skipping BAR%d\n", bar_index);
>               return 0;
> +     }
> 
>       if (msix_table->bar_index == bar_index) {
>               /*
> @@ -468,8 +470,14 @@ pci_vfio_mmap_bar(int vfio_dev_fd, struct
> mapped_pci_resource *vfio_res,
>                */
>               uint32_t table_start = msix_table->offset;
>               uint32_t table_end = table_start + msix_table->size;
> -             table_end = (table_end + ~PAGE_MASK) & PAGE_MASK;
> -             table_start &= PAGE_MASK;
> +             table_end = RTE_ALIGN(table_end, PAGE_SIZE);
> +             table_start = RTE_ALIGN(table_start, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +             /* If page-aligned start of MSI-X table is beyond BAR size,
> +              * shrink the mapping size to MSI-X table start address.
> +              */
> +             if (table_start >= bar->size)
> +                     table_start = msix_table->offset;
> 
>               if (table_start == 0 && table_end >= bar->size) {
>                       /* Cannot map this BAR */
> @@ -481,8 +489,17 @@ pci_vfio_mmap_bar(int vfio_dev_fd, struct
> mapped_pci_resource *vfio_res,
> 
>               memreg[0].offset = bar->offset;
>               memreg[0].size = table_start;
> -             memreg[1].offset = bar->offset + table_end;
> -             memreg[1].size = bar->size - table_end;
> +             if (bar->size < table_end) {
> +                     /*
> +                      * If MSI-X table end is beyond BAR end, don't attempt
> +                      * to perform second mapping.
> +                      */
> +                     memreg[1].offset = 0;
> +                     memreg[1].size = 0;
> +             } else {
> +                     memreg[1].offset = bar->offset + table_end;
> +                     memreg[1].size = bar->size - table_end;
> +             }
> 
>               RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL,
>                       "Trying to map BAR%d that contains the MSI-X "
> --
> 2.7.4

Reply via email to