On 2018-11-30 03:25, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
Generally I'm in favour of using established libraries (particularly for complex
functionality like RCU) but in this case I think there's a tradeoff with raw
performance.
The licensing info [1] is very interesting. Again I am no lawyer :)
[1]
https://github.com/urcu/userspace-rcu/blob/master/include/urcu/static/urcu-qsbr.h#L184
If you don't know the macro/inline function exception of LGPL 2.1, maybe
it's time to read the license text. Lawyer or not.
