> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stojaczyk, Dariusz
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 6:58 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; Stojaczyk, Dariusz <dariusz.stojac...@intel.com>;
> Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] dev: don't fail the hotplug request if device is attached in
> secondary
> 
> Consider the following scenario:
> 
>  1) primary process (A) starts, probes the bus
>  2) a secondary process (B) starts, probes the bus
>  3) yet another secondary process (C) starts
>  4) (C) registers the pci driver and hotplugs the device
>     * an IPC attach req is sent to the primary (A)
>       * (A) ignores the -EEXIST from process-local probe
>       * (A) propagates the request to all secondary processes
>         * (B) responds with -EEXIST
>       * (A) replies to the original request with the -EEXIST
>         return code
>     * the -EEXIST is returned back to the user, although the
>       device was successfully attached both locally and in
>       all other processes
> 
> This patch makes the primary process reply with rc=0 even if there was another
> secondary process with the device already attached. The primary process
> already didn't reply with -EEXIST when the device was attached locally, so now
> this behavior is even more consistent. Looking by the code, this seems to be 
> the
> originally intended behavior.
> 
> Fixes: ac9e4a17370f ("eal: support attach/detach shared device from
> secondary")
> Cc: qi.z.zh...@intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojac...@intel.com>

Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>

> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c
> index 7c9fcc46c..c0115d5f6 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/hotplug_mp.c
> @@ -391,13 +391,13 @@ int eal_dev_hotplug_request_to_secondary(struct
> eal_dev_mp_req *req)
>               struct eal_dev_mp_req *resp =
>                       (struct eal_dev_mp_req *)mp_reply.msgs[i].param;
>               if (resp->result != 0) {
> -                     req->result = resp->result;
>                       if (req->t == EAL_DEV_REQ_TYPE_ATTACH &&
> -                             req->result != -EEXIST)
> -                             break;
> +                             resp->result == -EEXIST)
> +                             continue;
>                       if (req->t == EAL_DEV_REQ_TYPE_DETACH &&
> -                             req->result != -ENOENT)
> -                             break;
> +                             resp->result == -ENOENT)
> +                             continue;
> +                     req->result = resp->result;     
>               }
>       }
> 
> --
> 2.17.1

Reply via email to