Thanks, PSB.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 11:05 AM
> To: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>
> Cc: wenzhuo...@intel.com; jingjing...@intel.com;
> bernard.iremon...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
> <or...@mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix MPLSoUDP encapsulation
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:54:50PM +0200, Dekel Peled wrote:
> > Set MPLS label value in appropriate location at mplsoudp_encap_conf,
> > so it is correctly copied to rte_flow_item_mpls.
> >
> > Fixes: a1191d39cb57 ("app/testpmd: add MPLSoUDP encapsulation")
> > Cc: or...@mellanox.com
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> > 1275074..40e64cc 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > @@ -15804,10 +15804,10 @@ static void
> cmd_set_mplsoudp_encap_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> > struct cmd_set_mplsoudp_encap_result *res = parsed_result;
> > union {
> > uint32_t mplsoudp_label;
> > - uint8_t label[3];
> > + uint8_t label[4];
> > } id = {
> > .mplsoudp_label =
> > - rte_cpu_to_be_32(res->label) &
> RTE_BE32(0x00ffffff),
> > + rte_cpu_to_be_32(res->label<<4) &
> RTE_BE32(0x00ffffff),
>
> Just to be sure, since label is a 20-bit value, isn't the shift supposed to
> be 12
> bits? In which case that mask is harmless but misleading. How about:
>
> .mplsoudp_label = rte_cpu_to_be32((res->label & 0xfffff) << 12);
>
Label is 20-bits value in a 24-bits field, see struct rte_flow_item_mpls.
> > };
> >
> > if (strcmp(res->mplsoudp, "mplsoudp_encap") == 0)
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
> --
> Adrien Mazarguil
> 6WIND
