On 27/04/15 18:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-04-24 11:38, Zoltan Kiss: >> On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: >>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM >>>> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect >>>> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also >>>> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on >>>> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements >>>> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the >>>> last patches easier. >>> >>> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com> >> >> When does this series get merged? > > It was acked on April 22 and your question was 2 days later on April 24. > Does it mean you are expecting it to be merged the day it is acked?
I was just curious about when to expect it, so I can plan to do some further work based on it, but nothing pressing. Regards, Zoltan > Or do you fear the merging because of a local dev you are working on? > Anyway, everybody seems happy with this version so it's going to be merged. >
