On 11/1/2018 12:51 PM, Shahaf Shuler wrote: > Thursday, November 1, 2018 11:37 AM, Dekel Peled: >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/7] add encap and decap actions to Direct >> Verbs flow in MLX5 PMD >> >> This series adds support of encap and decap actions in DV format. >> L2 tunnel support for VXLAN and NVGRE, and L2/L3 tunnel support using raw >> data buffer. >> It is using the generic encapsulation framework from [1]. >> >> [1] "ethdev: add generic L2/L3 tunnel encapsulation actions" >> >> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail >> s.dpdk.org%2Farchives%2Fdev%2F2018- >> October%2F114654.html&data=02%7C01%7Cshahafs%40mellanox.com >> %7Cfcb2ee95be4d41ce3c6508d63fddcf5d%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256 >> f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636766619229826892&sdata=Lgp9Dl3jVsrSAbvrWIe >> 6QNfUvdBJir7opduWpcnBvN0%3D&reserved=0 > > There were few compilation issues. Fixed locally, please have a look on the > diff and confirm. > > Ferruh - please note this patchset depends on the following patch to fix > compilation issues: > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/47676/
The dependent patch looks OK, but I wonder why I don't see the build error. mlx5_flow_dv.c has a big `#ifdef HAVE_IBV_FLOW_DV_SUPPORT` block And `HAVE_IBV_FLOW_DV_SUPPORT` set: if `infiniband/mlx5dv.h` has `mlx5dv_create_flow_action_packet_reformat()` In the rdma-core I have this function is not set, so I guess I don't compile this file at all. What is the dependency to have `mlx5dv_create_flow_action_packet_reformat()`? All the rdma-core versions I checked doesn't have this function, am I doing something wrong? Or is direct verbs feature something not released yet?
