01/11/2018 07:45, Arnon Warshavsky: > Hi > > >PS: the warning contains the regex. May it be improved? > > How about passing an explicit warning message to the awk instead of the > regex?
Yes it is a good idea. I think it can be a separate patch. Would you like to send it please? [..] > + if [ $? -ne 0 ] ; then > + ret=1 > + fi > + > + return $ret > } > > I also noticed that there is a need to keep the return value from each > check in case the first fails and the latter succeeds No need of return code. The error is detected if there is something printed to stdout.
