On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:31:55 +0100 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> Using the "physical_package_id" as a fallback for determining the > numa node of a core tends to be unreliable. Fix this by using a > detection routine which reads the numa information from > /sys/devices/system/node and just returns a numa node of 0 on > failure. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org> Documentation/cputopology.txt > 1) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/physical_package_id: > > physical package id of cpuX. Typically corresponds to a physical > socket number, but the actual value is architecture and platform > dependent.
