On Monday 15 October 2018 08:20 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > These libraries has exported functions but the target of those functions > are not user but other libraries. > > The version of these libraries doesn't mean much to the user so can be > dropped from release notes. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> > --- > Indeed this is more a question, should we keep them or remove them?
+1 for removing them. At least for dpaa/fslmc perspective, I don't see any additional benefit in release note. These libraries (dpaa/fslmc) are not actually 'libraries' in true (read, plugability) sense :) > --- > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst > index 03f73484e..8b755a7e9 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst > @@ -291,12 +291,6 @@ The libraries prepended with a plus sign were > incremented in this version. > librte_bbdev.so.1 > librte_bitratestats.so.2 > librte_bpf.so.1 > - + librte_bus_dpaa.so.2 > - + librte_bus_fslmc.so.2 > - + librte_bus_ifpga.so.2 > - + librte_bus_pci.so.2 > - + librte_bus_vdev.so.2 > - + librte_bus_vmbus.so.2 > librte_cfgfile.so.2 > librte_cmdline.so.2 > librte_compressdev.so.1 > @@ -322,7 +316,6 @@ The libraries prepended with a plus sign were incremented > in this version. > librte_meter.so.2 > librte_metrics.so.1 > librte_net.so.1 > - librte_pci.so.1 > librte_pdump.so.2 > librte_pipeline.so.3 > librte_pmd_bnxt.so.2 >
