09/10/2018 17:11, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 16:31:24 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> > 09/10/2018 16:14, Gaëtan Rivet:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 04:18:55AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > If a value contains a comma, rte_kvargs_tokenize() will split here.
> > > > In order to support list syntax [a,b] as value, an extra parsing of
> > > > the square brackets is added.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Nice, I was actually planning to do this.
> > >
> > > I think it could be useful to also support () and {}, as well as
> > > recursive lists, but it is best to have a first version to support
> > > representor and go from this.
> >
> > Yes, we have no usage of () and {} so far.
>
> This is getting complex enough that doing a real parser maybe necessary.
> Why not lex/yacc?
I don't know how much it fits with our needs for devargs.
> Or better yet go to real syntax like JSON.
JSON is not suitable for one-line string as devargs.
