On 04.10.2018 11:13, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> For messages that require a reply, a second ack should not be
> sent when reply-ack protocol feature is negotiated, even if
> the corresponding flag is set in the message.
> 
> The code is compliant with the spec but it isn't clear it is,
> so this patch adds a comment to make it explicit.
> 
> Suggested-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>

Reply via email to