On 10/1/2018 4:53 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
>> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:45:02 +0100
>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
>> To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>, Olivier Matz
>> <olivier.m...@6wind.com>
>> CC: dev@dpdk.org, sta...@dpdk.org, jiayu...@intel.com
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] mbuf: fix Tx offload mask
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>> Thunderbird/52.9.1
>>
>>
>> On 9/13/2018 2:47 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>>> Fixes missing PKT_TX_UDP_SEG value in PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6d18505efaa6 ("vhost: support UDP Fragmentation Offload")
>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>> Cc: jiayu...@intel.com
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
>>> index 9ce5d76d7..6a5dbbc8f 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
>>> @@ -343,7 +343,8 @@ extern "C" {
>>> PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT | \
>>> PKT_TX_TUNNEL_MASK | \
>>> PKT_TX_MACSEC | \
>>> - PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD)
>>> + PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD | \
>>> + PKT_TX_UDP_SEG)
>>
>> Also can you sort the list, it seem there was an intention to sort from high
>> bits to low, but broken, it makes easy to recognize missing items later.
>
> I think, sorting from high bits to low bits makes it easy to recognize.
> If it broken, How about fixing that(order based on bits) while rebasing to
> top of tree?
I am for order based on bits unless Olivier objects.
>
> I don't have strong opinion or sorting based on bit order vs name. Just shared
> my thought. Let me know your opinion, I will update it accordingly.
>
>
>
