On 9/19/2018 10:05 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 9/1/2018 5:32 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
>> From: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com>
>>
>> There was no direct association between the rxq's vnic and the vnic_info[].
>> Explicitly associate the two in bnxt_mq_rx_configure().
>>
>> Fixes: f7c3d72afff7 ("net/bnxt: fix Rx ring count limitation")
Wrong 'Fixes' reference:
Fixes: f7c3d72afff7 ("net/bnxt: fix Rx ring count limitation")
Correct one seems:
Fixes: 0a256e4a548b ("net/bnxt: fix Rx ring count limitation")
>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
>
> <...>
>
>> void bnxt_free_vnic_attributes(struct bnxt *bp)
>> {
>> struct bnxt_vnic_info *vnic;
>> + unsigned int i;
>>
>> - STAILQ_FOREACH(vnic, &bp->free_vnic_list, next) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < bp->nr_vnics; i++) {
>> if (vnic->rss_table) {
>
> Here vnic accessed without initial value [1], I guess intention was:
> "vnic = &bp->vnic_info[i];" before access.
>
> [1]
> .../drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_vnic.c:93:7: error: variable 'vnic' is uninitialized
> when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
> if (vnic->rss_table) {
> ^~~~
>
