>
> static int
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> index f8ba71cdb..48c3c606e 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -1505,6 +1505,34 @@ enum rte_flow_action_type {
> * error.
> */
> RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_NVGRE_DECAP,
> +
> + /**
> + * Modify IPv4 source address
> + *
> + * See struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv4.
> + */
> + RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC,
> +
> + /**
> + * Modify IPv4 destination address
> + *
> + * See struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv4.
> + */
> + RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST,
> +
> + /**
> + * Modify IPv6 source address
> + *
> + * See struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv6.
> + */
> + RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC,
> +
> + /**
> + * Modify IPv6 destination address
> + *
> + * See struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv6.
> + */
> + RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST,
> };
Hey Rahul,
Sorry for the late response. Just a small comment:
We would need the corresponding RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_* specified in pattern.
i.e RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6 must be in pattern for action
RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC
otherwise RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION return.
Would be better to document this in comments and __rte_flow.rst__
What do you think?
-Jack
