> -----Original Message-----
> From: chasmosau...@gmail.com [mailto:chasmosau...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Chas Williams
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 12:02 AM
> To: Lilijun (Jerry, Cloud Networking) <jerry.lili...@huawei.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bonding: add QinQ packet xmit hash
> support
>
> I think this change already went in dpdk-next-net:
>
> commit 61e99d7e944885e8d625ded41b5877653e0b637e
> Author: Yunjian Wang <wangyunj...@huawei.com>
> Date: Tue Aug 7 16:10:46 2018 +0800
>
> net/bonding: add support to match on 0x88A8 ethertype
>
> We assume VLAN ethtertype is 0x8100 in get_vlan_offset() function,
> but it could be 0x88A8 if QinQ is supported.
>
OK, thanks. I will update it.
> Fixes: 06fe78b98ccd ("bond: add mode 6")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunj...@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Chas Williams <ch...@att.com> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:52 PM
> Lilijun <jerry.lili...@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > For QinQ packet with ether type 0x88a8, dpdk bond's xmit hash policy
> > is not worked to get the ip or port field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lilijun <jerry.lili...@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> > b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> > index 58f7377..4417422 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> > @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
> > {
> > size_t vlan_offset = 0;
> >
> > - if (rte_cpu_to_be_16(ETHER_TYPE_VLAN) == *proto) {
> > + if (rte_cpu_to_be_16(ETHER_TYPE_VLAN) == *proto ||
> > + rte_cpu_to_be_16(ETHER_TYPE_QINQ) == *proto) {
> > struct vlan_hdr *vlan_hdr = (struct vlan_hdr
> > *)(eth_hdr + 1);
> >
> > vlan_offset = sizeof(struct vlan_hdr);
> > --
> > 1.8.4.msysgit.0
> >
> >
