> On Sep 13, 2018, at 11:33 PM, Xueming Li <xuemi...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> 
> This patch fixes the issue that representor port shows xstats of PF.
> 
> Fixes: 5a4b8e2612c5 ("net/mlx5: probe all port representors")

Wrong commit SHA.

> Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemi...@mellanox.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c
> index 91f3d47..ed5b51b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ struct mlx5_counter_ctrl {
>       et_stats->cmd = ETHTOOL_GSTATS;
>       et_stats->n_stats = xstats_ctrl->stats_n;
>       ifr.ifr_data = (caddr_t)et_stats;
> -     ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr, 1);
> +     ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr, 0);
>       if (ret) {
>               DRV_LOG(WARNING,
>                       "port %u unable to read statistic values from device",
> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ struct mlx5_counter_ctrl {
> 
>       drvinfo.cmd = ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO;
>       ifr.ifr_data = (caddr_t)&drvinfo;
> -     ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr, 1);
> +     ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr, 0);
>       if (ret) {
>               DRV_LOG(WARNING, "port %u unable to query number of statistics",
>                       dev->data->port_id);
> @@ -229,7 +229,6 @@ struct mlx5_counter_ctrl {
>               return;
>       }
>       dev_stats_n = ret;
> -     xstats_ctrl->stats_n = dev_stats_n;
>       /* Allocate memory to grab stat names and values. */
>       str_sz = dev_stats_n * ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
>       strings = (struct ethtool_gstrings *)
> @@ -244,7 +243,7 @@ struct mlx5_counter_ctrl {
>       strings->string_set = ETH_SS_STATS;
>       strings->len = dev_stats_n;
>       ifr.ifr_data = (caddr_t)strings;
> -     ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr, 1);
> +     ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr, 0);
>       if (ret) {
>               DRV_LOG(WARNING, "port %u unable to get statistic names",
>                       dev->data->port_id);
> @@ -275,6 +274,7 @@ struct mlx5_counter_ctrl {
>                       goto free;
>               }
>       }
> +     xstats_ctrl->stats_n = dev_stats_n;

Any reason to move it?
If it is done to group the code, I'm fine with that.

Thanks,
Yongseok

>       /* Copy to base at first time. */
>       assert(xstats_n <= MLX5_MAX_XSTATS);
>       ret = mlx5_read_dev_counters(dev, xstats_ctrl->base);
> @@ -307,6 +307,8 @@ struct mlx5_counter_ctrl {
>       unsigned int i;
>       uint64_t counters[n];
> 
> +     if (!priv->xstats_ctrl.stats_n)
> +             return 0;
>       if (n >= xstats_n && stats) {
>               struct mlx5_xstats_ctrl *xstats_ctrl = &priv->xstats_ctrl;
>               int stats_n;
> @@ -480,8 +482,11 @@ struct mlx5_counter_ctrl {
> mlx5_xstats_get_names(struct rte_eth_dev *dev __rte_unused,
>                     struct rte_eth_xstat_name *xstats_names, unsigned int n)
> {
> +     struct priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
>       unsigned int i;
> 
> +     if (!priv->xstats_ctrl.stats_n)
> +             return 0;
>       if (n >= xstats_n && xstats_names) {
>               for (i = 0; i != xstats_n; ++i) {
>                       strncpy(xstats_names[i].name,
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Reply via email to