On 05.09.2018 16:10, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 17:47:42 +0300
> Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> +void __rte_experimental
>> +rte_delay_us_sleep(unsigned int us)
>> +{
>> + struct timespec wait[2];
>> + int ind = 0;
>> +
>> + wait[0].tv_sec = 0;
>> + if (us >= US_PER_S) {
>> + wait[0].tv_sec = us / US_PER_S;
>> + us -= wait[0].tv_sec * US_PER_S;
>> + }
>> + wait[0].tv_nsec = 1000 * us;
>> +
>> + while (nanosleep(&wait[ind], &wait[1 - ind]) == EINTR)
>> + ind = 1 - ind;
>> +}
>> +
>
> This seems like a complex/tricky way to handle the case where
> nanosleep is interrupted. It needs a comment.
OK. I can add some comment here.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
