Hi, 2015-04-01 06:10, Zhang, XiaonanX: > > Tested-by: Xiaonan zhang<xiaonanx.zhang at intel.com> > > - OS: Fedora21 3.19.1-201.fc21.x86_64 > - GCC: gcc version 4.9.1 20140930 (Red Hat 4.9.1-11) (GCC) > - CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz > - NIC: Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller X710 > for 10GbE SFP+ [8086:1572] (rev 01) > - Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration > - Total 1 cases, 1 passed, 0 failed > > - Test case: Used Qos example to verified > -------------------------------------
What is the relation between link status timeout and qos_sched? > Traffic shaping for subport. Check that the subport rate is enforced. > > Set the subport output rate to x% of line rate (x = 10 .. 100). Set the > subport TC limits high (100% line rate each), so they do not constitute > limitations. Input traffic is 100% line rate. > > Different tb period and tb credits, therefore different output rate, are > tried: 25%, 50%, 75%, 90% and 100% the lineal rate. (The output for subport > is Tb credits per period / Tb period.) > The traffic is injected change subport value random. > > Other parameters are same before tests and they don't change here. > > Cmdline: ./examples/qos_sched/build/qos_sched -c 0xe -n 4 -- --pfc > "0,1,2,3,3" --cfg "/root/profile_sched_pipe_1.cfg" > > The result is this table: > > > +-----------------------+----------------------+ > | Subport output rate | Subport output rate | > | (% line rate) | (Mpps) | > +-----------+-----------+----------+-----------+ > | Expected | Actual | Expected | Actual | > +-----------+-----------+----------+-----------+ This table is empty. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaonan Zhang <xiaonanx.zhang at intel.com> It seems that this test report is not relevant. It will be ignored in the commit message. Sorry
