[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ethdev: silence error message on rte_eth_dev_owner_unset

[Stephen Hemminger]

From 74ad4c60262b1451a5a2fabf79a2df89c6c5373d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 15:37:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ethdev: silence error message on rte_eth_dev_owner_unset

The rte_eth_dev_owner_unset function always generates a log
message because the unset value for owner id is 0.

Also, when rte_eth_dev_owner_delete is called with a valid
owner id, the log message should be at NOTICE not ERROR
severity.

Fixes: 5b7ba31148a8 ("ethdev: add port ownership")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
---
v3 - handle rte_eth_dev_owner_delete
     leave other cleanups to later patch series

 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
index 4c320250589a..56dd9c2e83d9 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -393,11 +393,8 @@ static int
 rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(uint64_t owner_id)
 {
        if (owner_id == RTE_ETH_DEV_NO_OWNER ||
-           rte_eth_dev_shared_data->next_owner_id <= owner_id) {
-               RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid owner_id=%016"PRIx64"\n",
-                       owner_id);
+           rte_eth_dev_shared_data->next_owner_id <= owner_id)
                return 0;
-       }
        return 1;
 }
 
@@ -444,8 +441,12 @@ _rte_eth_dev_owner_set(const uint16_t port_id, const 
uint64_t old_owner_id,
        }
 
        if (!rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(new_owner->id) &&
-           !rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(old_owner_id))
+           !rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(old_owner_id)) {
+               RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
+                              "Invalid owner old_id=%016"PRIx64" 
new_id=%016"PRIx64"\n",
+                              old_owner_id, new_owner->id);
                return -EINVAL;
+       }
 
        port_owner = &rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner;
        if (port_owner->id != old_owner_id) {
@@ -516,9 +517,13 @@ rte_eth_dev_owner_delete(const uint64_t owner_id)
                        if (rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner.id == owner_id)
                                memset(&rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner, 0,
                                       sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_owner));
-               RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
+               RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(NOTICE,
                        "All port owners owned by %016"PRIx64" identifier have 
removed\n",
                        owner_id);
+       } else {
+               RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
+                              "Invalid owner id=%016"PRIx64"\n",
+                              owner_id);
        }
 
        rte_spinlock_unlock(&rte_eth_dev_shared_data->ownership_lock);
-- 
2.18.0