> On Aug 1, 2018, at 5:07 AM, Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Due to the upcoming external memory support [1], some API and ABI
> changes will be required. In addition, although the changes called
> out in the deprecation notice are not yet present in form of code
> in the published RFC itself, they are based on consensus on the
> mailing list [2] on how to best implement this feature.
>
> [1]
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatches.dpdk.org%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Flist%2F%3Fseries%3D453%26state%3D*&data=02%7C01%7Cyskoh%40mellanox.com%7Cc4caf7979dd943bb48c508d5f7a7661f%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636687220727753880&sdata=9yDGZf21ImYOUzM85n92cs%2BsgeafrrhG%2FlmJpWVpcWA%3D&reserved=0
> [2]
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmails.dpdk.org%2Farchives%2Fdev%2F2018-July%2F108002.html&data=02%7C01%7Cyskoh%40mellanox.com%7Cc4caf7979dd943bb48c508d5f7a7661f%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636687220727753880&sdata=zn4ZfXModNRgnSp649JFWd4Byr7RxH8mgcM6IKJTGWk%3D&reserved=0
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 14714fe94..629154711 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -8,6 +8,21 @@ API and ABI deprecation notices are to be posted here.
> Deprecation Notices
> -------------------
>
> +* eal: certain structures will change in EAL on account of upcoming external
> + memory support. Aside from internal changes leading to an ABI break, the
> + following externally visible changes will also be implemented:
> +
> + - ``rte_memseg_list`` will change to include a boolean flag indicating
> + whether a particular memseg list is externally allocated. This will have
> + implications for any users of memseg-walk-related functions, as they will
> + now have to skip externally allocated segments in most cases if the
> intent
> + is to only iterate over internal DPDK memory.
> + - ``socket_id`` parameter across the entire DPDK will gain additional
> meaning,
> + as some socket ID's will now be representing externally allocated
> memory. No
> + changes will be required for existing code as backwards compatibility
> will
> + be kept, and those who do not use this feature will not see these extra
> + socket ID's.
> +
> * eal: both declaring and identifying devices will be streamlined in v18.08.
> New functions will appear to query a specific port from buses, classes of
> device and device drivers. Device declaration will be made coherent with the
> --
Acked-by: Yongseok Koh <ys...@mellanox.com>
Thanks