Hi Yanglang:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Yanglong
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 3:31 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Wang, Dong1
> <dong1.w...@intel.com>; Wu, Yanglong <yanglong...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix link status when link is NACK
> 
> Link status should be set as down when link is NACK.
> 
> Fixes: dc66e5fd01b9 ("net/ixgbe: improve link state check on VF")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yanglong Wu <yanglong...@intel.com>
> 
> ---
> v2:
> no need to set link status again
> ---
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> index 997683d3b..3ffc72b40 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -3933,12 +3933,10 @@ ixgbevf_check_link(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
> ixgbe_link_speed *speed,
>       }
> 
>       if (no_pflink_check) {
> -             if (*speed == IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN)
> +             if (*speed == IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN) {
>                       mac->get_link_status = true;
> -             else
> -                     mac->get_link_status = false;
> -
> -             goto out;
> +                     goto out;
> +             }
>       }

Sorry, I can't understand this change combined with your commit log, could you 
explain more?
Btw, no_fplink_check = 1 means wait_to_complete = 0, 
but in the case when *speed != IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN , you will still go 
msg.read which I guess is not suppose be called in the case wait_to_complete = 
0, is it right?

>       /* if the read failed it could just be a mailbox collision, best wait
>        * until we are called again and don't report an error
> --
> 2.11.0

Reply via email to