19/07/2018 18:37, Andrew Rybchenko:
> On 19.07.2018 12:42, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> > Previously, we were skipping erasing pad because we were
> > expecting it to be freed when we were merging adjacent
> > segments. However, if there were no adjacent segments to
> > merge, we would've skipped erasing the pad, leaving non-zero
> > memory in our free space.
> >
> > Fix this by including pad in the erasing unconditionally.
> >
> > Fixes: e43a9f52b7ff ("malloc: fix pad erasing")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Reported-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
>
> Many thanks, the patch fixes the problem I've observed.
>
> Tested-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
Applied, thanks
