> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 11:20 AM
> To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Gavin Hu <gavin...@arm.com>; nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] queue: introduce queue APIs and driver 
> framework
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:06:13 -0500
> > From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > CC: honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com, gavin...@arm.com, n...@arm.com
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] queue: introduce queue APIs and driver 
> > framework
> > X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4
> >
> >
> > DPDK offers pipeline model of packet processing. One of the key 
> > components of this model is the core to core packet exchange.
> > rte_ring and rte_event_ring functions are 2 methods provided 
> > currently for core to core communication. However, these two do not 
> > separate the APIs from implementation. This does not allow using 
> > hardware queue implementations in pipeline model.
> > This change adds queue APIs and driver framework so that HW queues 
> > can be used for core to core communication in pipeline model.
> > When different implementations (ex: HW queues and rte_ring) are used
> 
> Just to understand, Do you have any HW in mind where it can do generic multi 
> producer/multi consumer queue operations for core to core in HW as offload.
> 
>> It is my understanding that NXP SoCs provide this capability (Hemant, please 
>> correct me if I am wrong).
>> It is not needed that the offload is a queue. It can be some other mechanism 
>> (for ex: enqueue/dequeue via the scheduler) as long as it performs better 
>> than the rte_ring implementation.

eventdev already abstracts CPU to CPU communication for HW offloads.
If NXP's HW comes under scheduler offload then it is already abstracted over 
eventdev.

I will let Hemant answer the specifics of NXP implementation.

Currently, the pipeline model does not use the event dev abstraction for CPU to 
CPU communication. One way is to use the event dev abstraction in the pipeline 
model.

> 
> > for the same object in different platforms, it is important to make 
> > sure that the application is portable. Hence features of different 
> > implementations must be elevated to the API level, so that the 
> > application writers can make the right choice.
> > Currently, basic APIs are created, will add more required APIs as 
> > this progresses.
> >
> > Honnappa Nagarahalli (1):
> >   queue: introduce queue APIs and driver framework
> >
> >  lib/librte_queue/rte_queue.c        | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/librte_queue/rte_queue.h        | 200 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/librte_queue/rte_queue_driver.h | 157
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 479 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 lib/librte_queue/rte_queue.c  create mode 100644 
> > lib/librte_queue/rte_queue.h  create mode 100644 
> > lib/librte_queue/rte_queue_driver.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >

Reply via email to