>On 28-Jun-18 8:03 AM, Kumar, Ravi1 wrote: >>> On 22-Jun-18 5:37 PM, Kumar, Ravi1 wrote:
>>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> As the memory subsystem in DPDK 18.05 is reworked, it has introduced a >>>> problem for AMD EPYC 2P platforms. >>>> The issue is that DPDK 18.05 only works with up to 4 NUMAs. For AMD EPYC >>>> 2P platforms, DPDK now only works with P0 (NUMA 0-3) and does not work >>>> with P1 (NUMA 4-7). >>>> >>>> The problem can be fixed by reducing some of the default settings of the >>>> memory subsystem. >>>> >>>> To solve this issue: >>>> - We can create our own config file for our integrated 10G >>>> NIC, that is for amd_xgbe PMD. This will make amd_xgbe immune to this >>>> problem. >>>> - However, when any other NIC (Intel, Mellanox, Cavium or >>>> Broadcom etc.) is plugged into NUMA 4-7, the problem will still be exposed. >>>> - If we only fix it in "config/common_base", it will cover >>>> all cases. >>>> >>>> Our current workaround is: >>>> Edit config file "./config/common_base" and change the following line >>>> CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE=131072 >>>> TO >>>> CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE=65536 >>>> >>>> Any better solution for this issue is welcome. >>>> >>>> We would appreciate if this issue can be fixed in the next release (18.08) >>>> so the STOCK version of DPDK works on AMD EPYC 2P platforms. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ravi >>>> >>> >>> Hi Ravi, >>> >>> What is the reason behind this limitation? Is it too much virtual memory >>> being preallocated? >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Anatoly >>> >> Hi Anatoly, >> >> We believe this is true. By default, too much virtual memory is being >> preallocated. The result is it can only support up to 4 NUMAs. >> >> Our workaround is to reduce the amount of preallocated virtual memory by >> half, so to support up to 8 NUMAs. >> >> Regards, >> Ravi >> > >I assume you see a bunch of failed mmap() calls with ENOMEM? > >In general, changing base config that way is an OK change, and it won't even >be an ABI break since this memory is allocated at runtime. I just want to make >sure that we fix the underlying problem, rather than the symptom. > >-- >Thanks, >Anatoly Hi Anatoly, Sorry for the late reply. I have been away and took me some time to get the logs. Here are some more details. Dpdk-18.05/config/common_base contains the constants used to configure the memory subsystem. CONFIG_RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES=8 CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS=64 # each memseg list will be limited to either RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_PER_LIST pages # or RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_LIST megabytes worth of memory, whichever is smaller CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_PER_LIST=8192 CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_LIST=32768 # a "type" is a combination of page size and NUMA node. total number of memseg # lists per type will be limited to either RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_PER_TYPE pages (split # over multiple lists of RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_PER_LIST pages), or # RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE megabytes of memory (split over multiple lists of # RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_LIST), whichever is smaller CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_PER_TYPE=32768 CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE=131072 # global maximum usable amount of VA, in megabytes CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB=524288 From the documentation. Dpdk-18.05/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst All possible virtual memory space that can ever be used for hugepage mapping in a DPDK process is preallocated at startup, thereby placing an upper limit on how much memory a DPDK application can have. DPDK memory is stored in segment lists, each segment is strictly one physical page. It is possible to change the amount of virtual memory being preallocated at startup by editing the following config variables: * ``CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS`` controls how many segment lists can DPDK have * ``CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_LIST`` controls how much megabytes of memory each segment list can address * ``CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_PER_LIST`` controls how many segments each segment can have * ``CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_PER_TYPE`` controls how many segments each memory typ can have (where "type" is defined as "page size + NUMA node" combination) * ``CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE`` controls how much megabytes of memory each memory type can address * ``CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB`` places a global maximum on the amount of memory DPDK can reserve Normally, these options do not need to be changed. .. note:: Preallocated virtual memory is not to be confused with preallocated hugepage memory! All DPDK processes preallocate virtual memory at startup. Hugepages can later be mapped into that preallocated VA space (if dynamic memory mode is enabled), and can optionally be mapped into it at startup. Memory setup with 2M pages works with the default configuration. With the default configuration and 2M hugepages 1. Total amount of memory for each NUMA zone does not exceed 128G (CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE). 2. Total number of segment lists per NUMA is limited to 32768 (CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_PER_TYPE). This constraint is met for each numa zone. This is the limiting factor for memory per numa with 2M hugepages and the default configuration. 3. The data structures are capable of supporting 64G of memory for each numa zone (32768 segments * 2M hugepagesize). 4. 8 NUMA zones * 64G = 512G. Therefore the total for all numa zones does not exceed 512G (CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB). 5. Resources are capable of allocating up to 64G per NUMA zone. Things will work as long as there are enough 2M hugepages to cover the memory needs of the DPDK applications AND no memory zone needs more than 64G. With the default configuration and 1G hugepages 1. Total amount of memory for each NUMA zone is limited to 128G (CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE). This constraint is hit for each numa zone. This is the limiting factor for memory per numa. 2. Total number of segment lists (128) does not exceed 32768 (CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_PER_TYPE). There are 128 segments per NUMA. 3. The data structures are capable of supporting 128G of memory for each numa zone (128 segments * 1G hugepagesize). However, only the first four NUMA zones get initialized before we hit CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB (512G). 4. The total for all numa zones is limited to 512G (CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB). This limit is hit after configuring the first four NUMA zones (4 x 128G = 512G). The rest of the NUMA zones cannot allocate memory. Apparently, it is intended to support max 8 NUMAs by default (CONFIG_RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES=8), but when 1G hugepages are use, it can only support up to 4 NUMAs. Possible workarounds when using 1G hugepages: 1. Decrease CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE to 65536 (limit of 64G per NUMA zone). This is probably the best option unless you need a lot of memory in any given NUMA. 2. Or, increase CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB to 1048576. With default settings, I got the following errors. amd@amd:~/dpdk/app/test-pmd$ sudo -E ./testpmd -c 0x7 -n 4 -- -i --portmask=0x3 --nb-cores=2 EAL: Detected 64 lcore(s) EAL: Detected 8 NUMA nodes EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/mp_socket EAL: Probing VFIO support... EAL: PCI device 0000:01:00.0 on NUMA socket 0 EAL: probe driver: 8086:1563 net_ixgbe EAL: PCI device 0000:01:00.1 on NUMA socket 0 EAL: probe driver: 8086:1563 net_ixgbe EAL: PCI device 0000:13:00.0 on NUMA socket 1 EAL: probe driver: 8086:10d3 net_e1000_em EAL: PCI device 0000:31:00.0 on NUMA socket 3 EAL: probe driver: 8086:1563 net_ixgbe EAL: PCI device 0000:31:00.1 on NUMA socket 3 EAL: probe driver: 8086:1563 net_ixgbe Interactive-mode selected testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_0>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=0 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_1>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=1 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_2>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=2 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_3>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=3 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_4>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=4 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1 Cause: Creation of mbuf pool for socket 4 failed: Cannot allocate memory amd@amd:~/dpdk/app/test-pmd$ After changing CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE=131072 to CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEM_MB_PER_TYPE=65536, the error is gone. amd@amd:~/dpdk/app/test-pmd$ sudo -E ./testpmd -c 0x7 -n 4 -- -i --portmask=0x3 --nb-cores=2 EAL: Detected 64 lcore(s) EAL: Detected 8 NUMA nodes EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/mp_socket EAL: Probing VFIO support... EAL: PCI device 0000:01:00.0 on NUMA socket 0 EAL: probe driver: 8086:1563 net_ixgbe EAL: PCI device 0000:01:00.1 on NUMA socket 0 EAL: probe driver: 8086:1563 net_ixgbe EAL: PCI device 0000:13:00.0 on NUMA socket 1 EAL: probe driver: 8086:10d3 net_e1000_em EAL: PCI device 0000:31:00.0 on NUMA socket 3 EAL: probe driver: 8086:1563 net_ixgbe EAL: PCI device 0000:31:00.1 on NUMA socket 3 EAL: probe driver: 8086:1563 net_ixgbe Interactive-mode selected testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_0>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=0 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_1>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=1 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_2>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=2 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_3>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=3 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_4>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=4 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_5>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=5 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_6>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=6 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_7>: n=163456, size=2176, socket=7 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc Configuring Port 0 (socket 0) Port 0: A0:36:9F:F7:94:68 Configuring Port 1 (socket 0) Port 1: A0:36:9F:F7:94:69 Checking link statuses... Done testpmd> Regards, Ravi
