Hi Pablo,

I'll merge this patch with the next one. Will do the same with checkpatch fixes too. Since this is a common benchmarking application, I wanted to highlight all the changes introduced. That's the reason for small patches.

Shall I send a v2 after doing this? Are there any other comments on this series?

Anoob

On 10-07-2018 04:16, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
External Email

Hi Anoob,

-----Original Message-----
From: Anoob Joseph [mailto:anoob.jos...@caviumnetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 11:18 AM
To: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
<pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoob.jos...@caviumnetworks.com>; Jerin Jacob
<jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>; Narayana Prasad
<narayanaprasad.athr...@caviumnetworks.com>; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 01/15] examples/l2fwd: add new header to move common
code

v1:
* No change

Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoob.jos...@caviumnetworks.com>
---
  examples/l2fwd/l2fwd_common.h | 6 ++++++
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 examples/l2fwd/l2fwd_common.h

I think this patch can be merged to the next patch.
I don't see the need to have a separate patch just adding a header with no code.

Pablo


Reply via email to