Hi Anoob, > -----Original Message----- > From: Anoob Joseph [mailto:anoob.jos...@caviumnetworks.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 11:18 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com> > Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoob.jos...@caviumnetworks.com>; Jerin Jacob > <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>; Narayana Prasad > <narayanaprasad.athr...@caviumnetworks.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH v1 06/15] examples/l2fwd: fix lines exceeding 80 char limit > > v1: > * Replaced 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' > > Fixes: e2366e74e029 ("examples: use buffered Tx") > Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release") > > Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoob.jos...@caviumnetworks.com>
I don't think it is needed to have this patch. Generally, new code should follow the 80 char limit, But I think we don't need to have a patch fixing existing code (and definitely, this doesn't need backport).
