> -----Original Message-----
> From: Verma, Shally [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 9:39 AM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>; Gupta, Ashish
> <[email protected]>; Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; Daly, Lee
> <[email protected]>; Sahu, Sunila <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/4] compressdev: replace mbuf scatter gather flag
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Pablo de Lara [mailto:[email protected]]
> >Sent: 04 July 2018 19:41
> >To: Verma, Shally <[email protected]>; Gupta, Ashish
> ><[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
> >Cc: [email protected]; Pablo de Lara <[email protected]>
> >Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] compressdev: replace mbuf scatter gather flag
> >
> >External Email
> >
> >The current mbuf scatter gather feature flag is too ambiguous, as it is
> >not clear if input and/or output buffers can be scatter gather mbufs or
> >not.
> >
> >Therefore, three new flags will replace this flag:
> >- RTE_COMP_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_SGL_OUT
> >- RTE_COMP_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_FB_OUT
> >- RTE_COMP_FF_OOP_FB_IN_SGL_OUT
> >
> [Shally] Believe Out of place is default support on current compression API, 
> so
> why do we need _OOP_ here?

Hi Shally,

You are right, but I just wanted to clarify that the scenario is for Out of 
place only.

Thanks,
Pablo

> 
> Thanks
> Shally
> >Note that out-of-place flat buffers is supported by default and
> >in-place is not supported by the library.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <[email protected]>
> >Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <[email protected]>

Reply via email to