Hi Thomas, Ouyang is right!
Yes, I had finished the patch validation, so I reply the email, thanks. Regards, Jingguo Fu -----Original Message----- From: Ouyang, Changchun Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 22:27 To: Thomas Monjalon; Fu, JingguoX Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ouyang, Changchun Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in virtio pmd Hi Thomas, > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:32 PM > To: Fu, JingguoX > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in virtio > pmd > > Hi Jingguo, > > 2014-09-24 09:22, Fu, JingguoX: > > Tested-by: Jingguo Fu <jingguox.fu at intel.com> > > > > This patch includes 1 files, and has been tested by Intel. > > Please see information as the following: > > > > Host: > > Fedora 19 x86_64, Linux Kernel 3.9.0, GCC 4.8.2 Intel Xeon CPU > > E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz > > NIC: Intel Niantic 82599, Intel i350, Intel 82580 and Intel 82576 > > > > Guest: > > Fedora 16 x86_64, Linux Kernel 3.4.2, GCC 4.6.3 Qemu emulator 1.4.2 > > > > This patch tests with user space vhost driver library patch. > > We verified zero copy and one copy test cases for functional and > performance. > > > > This patch depend on the two patches: > > [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: Update max RX packet length > > http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005107.html > > [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: Fix vring entry number issue > > http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005170.html > > This patch and the previous one (Support jumbo frame in user space vhost) > were part of release 1.7.1. > You already sent an email about this test: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-July/004466.html > So I'm not sure it deserves another email today. > As I know, Jingguo was trying to verify more cases (such as jumbo frame forward between VM to VM ) with this v3 patch, I think he finish all test cases today, so send this mail. And I think he also validate these 2 patches in his recent validation work: http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005107.html http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005170.html jingguo, am I correct? Thanks and regards, Changchun
