Hi Shally,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shally Verma [mailto:shally.ve...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 7:05 AM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>
> Cc: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; akhil.go...@nxp.com;
> dev@dpdk.org; pathr...@caviumnetworks.com; Sunila Sahu
> <sunila.s...@caviumnetworks.com>; Ashish Gupta
> <ashish.gu...@caviumnetworks.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] lib/cryptodev: add asym op support in cryptodev
> 
> Extend DPDK librte_cryptodev to:
> - define asym op type in rte_crypto_op_type and associated
>   op pool create/alloc APIs
> - define asym session and associated session APIs
> 
> If PMD shows in its feature flag that it supports both sym and asym then it 
> must
> support those on all its qps.
> 
> Changes from v2:
> - added rte_cryptodev_asym_session_set/get_private_data for app to setup
> private data in a session as per latest dpdk-next-crypto spec
> - rename rte_cryptodev_get_asym_session_private_size to be consistent with
> other API names
> - correct rte_cryptodev_asym_session_create to pass void** to
> rte_mempool_get() and add for private_data_size flag
> 
> Changes from v1
>     - resolve new line error in librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_version.map
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shally Verma <shally.ve...@caviumnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sunila Sahu <sunila.s...@caviumnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Gupta <ashish.gu...@caviumnetworks.com>

...

> +int __rte_experimental
> +rte_cryptodev_asym_session_init(uint8_t dev_id,
> +             struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session *sess,
> +             struct rte_crypto_asym_xform *xforms,
> +             struct rte_mempool *mp)
> +{
> +     struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
> +     uint8_t index;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     dev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_dev(dev_id);
> +
> +     if (sess == NULL || xforms == NULL || dev == NULL)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     index = dev->driver_id;
> +

Check if asym_session_configure is implemented in the device, like this:

RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->asym_session_configure, -ENOTSUP);

This way, there won't be a segmentation fault when using a device that
does not support asymmetric operations.

> +     if (sess->sess_private_data[index] == NULL) {
> +             ret = dev->dev_ops->asym_session_configure(dev,
> +                                                     xforms,
> +                                                     sess, mp);
> +             if (ret < 0) {
> +                     CDEV_LOG_ERR(
> +                             "dev_id %d failed to configure session details",
> +                             dev_id);
> +                     return ret;

...

> +int __rte_experimental
> +rte_cryptodev_asym_session_clear(uint8_t dev_id,
> +             struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session *sess) {
> +     struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
> +
> +     dev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_dev(dev_id);
> +
> +     if (dev == NULL || sess == NULL)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +

Same as above, add the following.

RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->asym_session_clear, -ENOTSUP);

> +     dev->dev_ops->asym_session_clear(dev, sess);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}

I will send a patch doing the same for symmetric.

Pablo

Reply via email to