> -----Original Message-----
> From: Verma, Shally [mailto:shally.ve...@cavium.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 6:02 PM
> To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Doherty, Declan
> <declan.dohe...@intel.com>; ravi1.ku...@amd.com; Jacob, Jerin
> <jerin.jacobkollanukka...@cavium.com>; Zhang, Roy Fan
> <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>;
> t...@semihalf.com; jianjay.z...@huawei.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] cryptodev: remove old get session size
> functions
>
> Hi Pablo
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Akhil Goyal
> >Sent: 21 June 2018 18:29
> >To: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>;
> >declan.dohe...@intel.com; ravi1.ku...@amd.com; Jacob, Jerin
> ><jerin.jacobkollanukka...@cavium.com>; roy.fan.zh...@intel.com;
> >fiona.tr...@intel.com; t...@semihalf.com; jianjay.z...@huawei.com
> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] cryptodev: remove old get session
> >size functions
> >
> >External Email
> >
> >Hi Pablo,
> >
> >
> >On 6/9/2018 3:32 AM, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> >> Removed rte_cryptodev_get_header_session_size
> >> and rte_cryptodev_get_private_session_size functions, as they have
> >> been substituted with functions specific for symmetric operations,
> >> with _sym_ word after "rte_cryptodev_".
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>
> >> ---
...
> >> +
> >> + - ``rte_cryptodev_get_header_session_size`` is replaced with
> >> + ``rte_cryptodev_sym_get_header_session_size``
> >> + - ``rte_cryptodev_get_private_session_size`` is replaced with
> >> + ``rte_cryptodev_sym_get_private_session_size``
> >> +
> >rte_cryptodev_get_private_session_size is not removed in this patch. I
> >think you missed it in your patch.
Right Akhil, thanks for spotting this. Will fix in next version.
> >
> >-Akhil
> >>
> >> ABI Changes
> >> -----------
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> >> b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> >> index a07904fb9..40e249e79 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> >> @@ -1181,12 +1181,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_sym_session_free(struct
> rte_cryptodev_sym_session *sess)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -unsigned int
> >> -rte_cryptodev_get_header_session_size(void)
> >> -{
> >> - return rte_cryptodev_sym_get_header_session_size();
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> unsigned int
> >> rte_cryptodev_sym_get_header_session_size(void)
> >> {
>
> [Shally] I missed this before. I think this implementation either should
> change to
> use nb_drivers which support symmetric or else I am not seeing a need for
> separate sym specific API for header_size since it will always be same for
> both
> sym and asym.
The implementation is already using nb_drivers to calculate the size, right?
Anyway, I understand that the way asymmetric sessions are done, the API
will be the same, but this could change in the future and since we have already
deprecated the
generic function (get_header_session_size), I think we should continue and have
both _sym and _asym_ functions.
Thanks,
Pablo
