> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 5:14 PM
> To: Eads, Gage <gage.e...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com; Van Haaren, Harry
> <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; Rao, Nikhil <nikhil....@intel.com>; Carrillo,
> Erik
> G <erik.g.carri...@intel.com>; Gujjar, Abhinandan S
> <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] service: add mechanism for quiescing a
> service
>
> 14/06/2018 15:51, Gage Eads:
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_service.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_service.h
> > @@ -162,6 +162,22 @@ int32_t rte_service_runstate_set(uint32_t id,
> > uint32_t runstate); int32_t rte_service_runstate_get(uint32_t id);
> >
> > /**
> > + * This function returns whether the service may be currently
> > + executing on
> > + * at least one lcore, or definitely is not. This function can be
> > + used to
> > + * determine if, after setting the service runstate to stopped, the
> > + service
> > + * is still executing an a service lcore.
>
> Typo: "an a"
Will fix.
>
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > +DPDK_18.08 {
> > + global:
> > +
> > + rte_service_may_be_active;
> > +
> > +} DPDK_18.05;
>
> Why it is not experimental?
>
It should be -- my mistake.
Thanks,
Gage
